<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cannabidiol researchers discover the switch to turn off aggressive breast cancer gene</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thedaktory.org.nz/news/cannabidiol-researchers-discover-the-switch-to-turn-off-aggressive-breast-cancer-gene/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thedaktory.org.nz/news/cannabidiol-researchers-discover-the-switch-to-turn-off-aggressive-breast-cancer-gene/</link>
	<description>Live Like it&#039;s Legal</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 13:49:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: pet village</title>
		<link>http://thedaktory.org.nz/news/cannabidiol-researchers-discover-the-switch-to-turn-off-aggressive-breast-cancer-gene/comment-page-1/#comment-22094</link>
		<dc:creator>pet village</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2011 17:37:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedaktory.org.nz/?p=773#comment-22094</guid>
		<description>Great submit! Extremely full and also depth details. That�s just what i would like! Done well!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great submit! Extremely full and also depth details. That�s just what i would like! Done well!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hamstar</title>
		<link>http://thedaktory.org.nz/news/cannabidiol-researchers-discover-the-switch-to-turn-off-aggressive-breast-cancer-gene/comment-page-1/#comment-3058</link>
		<dc:creator>hamstar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Apr 2010 11:53:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedaktory.org.nz/?p=773#comment-3058</guid>
		<description>And to think that cannabidiol, a non-psycotropic chemical that can stop cancer metastasis, is a Schedule 1 drug in the USA.  

Wait a year or two and there will be a synthesized chemical copy of cannabidiol made in a lab.  That will be legal, the pharma company with the patent probably won&#039;t use it however because, if it can stop the spreading of the cancer, less (money making) cancer drugs will be needed.  Thank guys, great work! /sarcasm

Also as I understand it, CBD usually accompanies THC in approx 4:6 ratio and is responsible for regulating the high caused by THC (as it affects how the THC is absorbed by the cannabinoid receptor).  This ratio can vary from strain to strain however.  Now my assumption is that without the CBD, strange shit can happen, which is why people taking marinol (lab-made THC) can skitz out.  I also assume that the Skunk weed available in the UK is a strain bred with a low CBD to THC ratio, making the users of that strain skitz out as well.

Am I correct in my assumptions?  Can anyone refute this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And to think that cannabidiol, a non-psycotropic chemical that can stop cancer metastasis, is a Schedule 1 drug in the USA.  </p>
<p>Wait a year or two and there will be a synthesized chemical copy of cannabidiol made in a lab.  That will be legal, the pharma company with the patent probably won&#8217;t use it however because, if it can stop the spreading of the cancer, less (money making) cancer drugs will be needed.  Thank guys, great work! /sarcasm</p>
<p>Also as I understand it, CBD usually accompanies THC in approx 4:6 ratio and is responsible for regulating the high caused by THC (as it affects how the THC is absorbed by the cannabinoid receptor).  This ratio can vary from strain to strain however.  Now my assumption is that without the CBD, strange shit can happen, which is why people taking marinol (lab-made THC) can skitz out.  I also assume that the Skunk weed available in the UK is a strain bred with a low CBD to THC ratio, making the users of that strain skitz out as well.</p>
<p>Am I correct in my assumptions?  Can anyone refute this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

