<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for The Daktory</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thedaktory.org.nz/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thedaktory.org.nz</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 00:00:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Robbie Williams angers drug campaigners by calling cannabis a &#8216;lovely drug&#8217; by Cam Wright (Dakta Bourbon)</title>
		<link>http://thedaktory.org.nz/misc/robbie-williams-angers-drug-campaigners-by-calling-cannabis-a-lovely-drug/comment-page-1/#comment-3037</link>
		<dc:creator>Cam Wright (Dakta Bourbon)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 00:00:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedaktory.org.nz/?p=764#comment-3037</guid>
		<description>I am none of the above, but I smoke bud!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am none of the above, but I smoke bud!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Robbie Williams angers drug campaigners by calling cannabis a &#8216;lovely drug&#8217; by zedd</title>
		<link>http://thedaktory.org.nz/misc/robbie-williams-angers-drug-campaigners-by-calling-cannabis-a-lovely-drug/comment-page-1/#comment-3036</link>
		<dc:creator>zedd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 23:47:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedaktory.org.nz/?p=764#comment-3036</guid>
		<description>Comm. Harry Anslinger (1930s) testified that &#039;marijuana&#039; smoking was associated with : &quot;Negroes, Mexicans &amp; ENTERTAINERS !! It seems that these attitudes may still remain ?

Kiaora</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Comm. Harry Anslinger (1930s) testified that &#8216;marijuana&#8217; smoking was associated with : &#8220;Negroes, Mexicans &amp; ENTERTAINERS !! It seems that these attitudes may still remain ?</p>
<p>Kiaora</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Robbie Williams angers drug campaigners by calling cannabis a &#8216;lovely drug&#8217; by Dakta SiFFiN</title>
		<link>http://thedaktory.org.nz/misc/robbie-williams-angers-drug-campaigners-by-calling-cannabis-a-lovely-drug/comment-page-1/#comment-3035</link>
		<dc:creator>Dakta SiFFiN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 21:37:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedaktory.org.nz/?p=764#comment-3035</guid>
		<description>See people, even entertainers smoke cannabis!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>See people, even entertainers smoke cannabis!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Another Drug War Injustice by Blair Anderson</title>
		<link>http://thedaktory.org.nz/news/another-drug-war-injustice/comment-page-1/#comment-3034</link>
		<dc:creator>Blair Anderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 12:54:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedaktory.org.nz/uncategorized/another-drug-war-injustice/#comment-3034</guid>
		<description>The injustice of catching one person per NFL year for pot when drawn from 16% of all NZ&#039;s surveyed demograph... arround one in 6  players, some say more, it&#039;s just how it is. The worst injustice is labeling alcohol more legal than cannabis thus promoting and protecting sports subsidy, from Harringtons to Sparc. And ALAC says nothing, they according to them at least, are not funded too. It will be more interesting to the players than to the associations (where even not so angels fear to tread) of that I have no doubt. DrugFree Sport still thinks they can turn your addiction arround as if it is just some kind of career move. Couldnt be to Touch Rugby as any reading of their profile will tell you. Touch Rugby would all but dissapear under a testing regime. But no one will go there, it&#039;s the way it is. It is not an  endless string of fashionable mollochs, it is just lurching incompetancy at sending any kind of meaningful signal while the double standards reign supreme. 

Cannabis players can cope with sport better than drunks. It is anti-aggressogenic character makes it a safer alternative for enjoyable recreation. We have a class for recreational drug use, ministry of health approved.  Keep problematic drug use to when drug use is problematic. Problem Solved.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The injustice of catching one person per NFL year for pot when drawn from 16% of all NZ&#8217;s surveyed demograph&#8230; arround one in 6  players, some say more, it&#8217;s just how it is. The worst injustice is labeling alcohol more legal than cannabis thus promoting and protecting sports subsidy, from Harringtons to Sparc. And ALAC says nothing, they according to them at least, are not funded too. It will be more interesting to the players than to the associations (where even not so angels fear to tread) of that I have no doubt. DrugFree Sport still thinks they can turn your addiction arround as if it is just some kind of career move. Couldnt be to Touch Rugby as any reading of their profile will tell you. Touch Rugby would all but dissapear under a testing regime. But no one will go there, it&#8217;s the way it is. It is not an  endless string of fashionable mollochs, it is just lurching incompetancy at sending any kind of meaningful signal while the double standards reign supreme. </p>
<p>Cannabis players can cope with sport better than drunks. It is anti-aggressogenic character makes it a safer alternative for enjoyable recreation. We have a class for recreational drug use, ministry of health approved.  Keep problematic drug use to when drug use is problematic. Problem Solved.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Cannabis users different from &#8216;true drug cheats&#8217; by zedd</title>
		<link>http://thedaktory.org.nz/news/cannabis-users-different-from-true-drug-cheats/comment-page-1/#comment-3033</link>
		<dc:creator>zedd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 21:03:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedaktory.org.nz/?p=749#comment-3033</guid>
		<description>How ridiculous... &quot;Cannabis is a performance enhancing drug &quot; HA HA HA</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How ridiculous&#8230; &#8220;Cannabis is a performance enhancing drug &#8221; HA HA HA</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 4 Florida Cities Trying to Decriminalize Marijuana by CivilLibertarian</title>
		<link>http://thedaktory.org.nz/news/4-florida-cities-trying-to-decriminalize-marijuana/comment-page-1/#comment-3032</link>
		<dc:creator>CivilLibertarian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 20:51:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedaktory.org.nz/?p=731#comment-3032</guid>
		<description>HI, once again. it seems the nz dollar is dropping....soon we will be controlled by other countries. We must specialise now or risk losing our identity. If we are the first country to really look at  cannabis laws and integrate cannabis in a non harmful way into our economy, we will become extremely rich and all the money will help our struggling nz economy to provide an even greater standard of living! We already specialise in agronomy so i guess even hemp can be included!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HI, once again. it seems the nz dollar is dropping&#8230;.soon we will be controlled by other countries. We must specialise now or risk losing our identity. If we are the first country to really look at  cannabis laws and integrate cannabis in a non harmful way into our economy, we will become extremely rich and all the money will help our struggling nz economy to provide an even greater standard of living! We already specialise in agronomy so i guess even hemp can be included!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Restore Respect for Law, End Cannabis Prohibition by Dilly from filly</title>
		<link>http://thedaktory.org.nz/news/restore-respect-for-law-end-cannabis-prohibition/comment-page-1/#comment-3031</link>
		<dc:creator>Dilly from filly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 03:20:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedaktory.org.nz/?p=726#comment-3031</guid>
		<description>Give it up guys we are never going to legalize so just live like its legal its all we can do 
fighting them threw protest or any other way is just going to piss them off 


p.s whats up with the daktory forums they are less active then most stoners</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Give it up guys we are never going to legalize so just live like its legal its all we can do<br />
fighting them threw protest or any other way is just going to piss them off </p>
<p>p.s whats up with the daktory forums they are less active then most stoners</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on New Study: Marijuana Does Not Cause Psychosis, Lung Damage, or Skin Cancer by Rebecca Mensch (Dakta squid)</title>
		<link>http://thedaktory.org.nz/news/new-study-marijuana-does-not-cause-psychosis-lung-damage-or-skin-cancer/comment-page-1/#comment-3030</link>
		<dc:creator>Rebecca Mensch (Dakta squid)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 23:00:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedaktory.org.nz/?p=728#comment-3030</guid>
		<description>This does not qualify as a &quot;study&quot; and judging from the way it was written, you do not have the scientific background to write a paper defending a hypothesis. It is however, a great collection of some scewed facts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This does not qualify as a &#8220;study&#8221; and judging from the way it was written, you do not have the scientific background to write a paper defending a hypothesis. It is however, a great collection of some scewed facts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on New Study: Marijuana Does Not Cause Psychosis, Lung Damage, or Skin Cancer by Dakta SiFFiN</title>
		<link>http://thedaktory.org.nz/news/new-study-marijuana-does-not-cause-psychosis-lung-damage-or-skin-cancer/comment-page-1/#comment-3029</link>
		<dc:creator>Dakta SiFFiN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 22:54:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedaktory.org.nz/?p=728#comment-3029</guid>
		<description>Good read, needs to be sent to the newspaper people to read</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good read, needs to be sent to the newspaper people to read</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on New Study: Marijuana Does Not Cause Psychosis, Lung Damage, or Skin Cancer by zedd</title>
		<link>http://thedaktory.org.nz/news/new-study-marijuana-does-not-cause-psychosis-lung-damage-or-skin-cancer/comment-page-1/#comment-3028</link>
		<dc:creator>zedd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 22:52:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedaktory.org.nz/?p=728#comment-3028</guid>
		<description>Anslinger &amp; his cohorts used lies &amp; exaggerations to convince the UN to pass the single convention 1961. Today this &quot;reefer madness&quot; stuff continues, with a focus on stating that extremes &amp; worse case scenarios are the norm.. 
Its like saying that everyone who drinks a beer in their teens, is doomed to become an alcoholic.. A load of b-s

Kiaora</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anslinger &amp; his cohorts used lies &amp; exaggerations to convince the UN to pass the single convention 1961. Today this &#8220;reefer madness&#8221; stuff continues, with a focus on stating that extremes &amp; worse case scenarios are the norm..<br />
Its like saying that everyone who drinks a beer in their teens, is doomed to become an alcoholic.. A load of b-s</p>
<p>Kiaora</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
